CodeVetter
← Code-review benchmark

Optimization proof · observed 2026-08-14

Every project gets its own evidence boundary.

These are separate local trials, not one blended headline. Each page names the exact flow, revision, source candidate, patch cost, correctness scope, repeated measurement, decision, availability, and limitation. A rejected experiment remains visible.

How Optimize works

Project case studies

Anime Listretained35.8% fewerA two-file import-boundary change materially reduced one local Vite navigation, while a separate production build showed almost no shipped-bundle movement.2 files · 62 gross lines · net 58 · 0 dependenciesFree AIconfirmed29.8% fasterA one-pass model-selection loop removed an intermediate array and improved every tested registry size without growing the patch.1 file · 45 gross lines · net -7 · 0 dependenciesStarboardrejected5.3% slowerA plausible incremental token scanner passed focused correctness but ran slower, so CodeVetter rejected it and restored the original code.1 file · 19 gross lines · net 5 · 0 dependencies

These three receipts are the intentionally small public set. Historical research capability is labeled separately from the compact runtime path currently shipped in CodeVetter.