01 / THE WORK
What we admire
Panto’s approach to reviewing with multiple context sources stood out in our landscape survey. A changed function can satisfy its local tests while still violating a product requirement recorded elsewhere.
02 / THE LESSON
The principle that stayed
More sources can improve review only when the system identifies where each claim came from. A plausible business rule inferred from prose is a lead, not an observed runtime result.
03 / OUR BOUNDARY
Where CodeVetter stands
CodeVetter’s intent and business-rule work preserves source identity and uncertainty. Panto is a research reference; our local verifier does not import Panto’s context or scanning service.